Repository | Series | Book | Chapter
The physician as moral arbiter
pp. 23-31
Abstract
When asked to comment about the physician as moral arbiter, I thought it useful to begin by considering just what a moral arbiter would be. To speak of someone as a moral arbiter, or to speak of some group as functioning in that role, is to say that there is arbitration and that it concerns moral matters.
Publication details
Published in:
Bondeson William B., et al. (1982) New knowledge in the biomedical sciences: some moral implications of its acquisition, possession, and use. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 23-31
Deprecated: DateTime::createFromFormat(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($datetime) of type string is deprecated in /home/clients/b010bcc84441ff7c5adbaf4e922effaa/web/mom/module/pub/view-inc.php on line 496
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7723-5_2
Full citation:
Gorovitz Samuel (1982) „The physician as moral arbiter“, In: W. B. Bondeson, T. Engelhardt, Spicker & J.M. White Jr (eds.), New knowledge in the biomedical sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, 23–31.